Abstract: Civilian casualty counts are products of specific methods, epistemologies, standards of proofs, and definitions. This article analyzes how the US military and the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan assess civilian casualties. These counts are based on different and contestable concepts of who counts as a civilian, what counts as conflict violence, and what counts of evidence of civilian casualties. We illustrate this argument with four examples: the distinction between direct and indirect deaths, the boundary between civilians and non-civilians, the boundary between conflict violence and criminal violence, and hierarchies in the visibility of civilians.
This content is restricted to site members. If you are an existing user, please login. New users may click here to subscribe.
Current Issue

Please check out our latest blog, "From a Right of Self-Defence to the Fact of Conquest,"
🎉We are excited to share that the first Subscribe to Open issue of Humanity has now been published online and will be Open Access in perpetuity:
https://muse.jhu.edu/issue/53496
Please celebrate with us by reading these incredible articles! 🎊
Login Status
If you are not a subscriber, you can sign up now.