From the first months of 1947 up to October 1948, the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) made a remarkable, and largely misunderstood, effort to directly shape the content of what became the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), which was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on December 10, 1948. Although this effort failed in its objectives, the work of UNESCO during this short time (about a year and a half) has been invested with a range of meanings and interpretations that go well beyond the historical record. The reasons for the misreading and appropriation of the work of UNESCO during this period can be understood on both historiographical and ideological grounds. Nevertheless, this essay will focus on the specific historical timeline within which the UNESCO human rights project was conceived and implemented. Given the incomplete ways in which the role of UNESCO and the key participants in the process have been characterized, often with significant implications for the wider history of human rights after the war, it is important to establish an interpretive record of this key period in UNESCO’s history. Thus, considerable attention will be given here to a description of the evolution of institutional developments, bureaucratic and personal relationships, and historical idiosyncrasies, with an eye toward how these deepen our appreciation for the role of UNESCO as a foundational institution of the postwar settlement.1 However, beyond the historical analysis, this essay will acknowledge the broader stakes involved through a discussion of how UNESCO’s efforts to shape what became the UDHR reflect what will be characterized as the “unsettled firmament” of the international system in the early postwar years, and it will portray a UNESCO that “might have been” had its bold moves in 1947 not been turned away and even denounced by what turned out to be the stronger institutional and political forces working on the American side within the embryonic UN system.2
Follow Us On Twitter
My TweetsCurrent Issue
Our new issue features a conversation between Jasbir K. Puar and Oishik Sircar, available open-access on the Humanity journal website. The issue also includes essays on the politics humanitarian architecture and the Parisian “Yellow Bubble,” family planning projects in postcolonial Morocco, how Amnesty International's formative years shaped professional human rights activism, and the linguistic and affective labor of field interpreters for UN missions. It contains review essays on theories of political violence and on global histories of slavery and indentured labor.
Recent Blog Posts
Interview with Lori Allen
Interview with Lori Allen (SOAS) on her recent book A History of False Hope: Investigative Commissions in Palestine (Stanford University Press, 2020). The interview was conducted via email by Tobias Kelly, member of the Humanity editorial collective. Tobias Kelly (TK): Can you tell us how you came to this project and how it relates to your previous work? Lori Allen (LA): I see this book as being a prequel to my first book, The Rise and Fall of Human Rights: Cynicism and Politics in Occupied Palestine Continue reading →
Unsettling Effects of the Human Shield Concept
This essay is part of a symposium on Neve Gordon and Nicola Perugini’s Human Shields. All contributions to the symposium can be found here. Neve Gordon and Nicola Perugini’s Human Shields is arranged as a composition of twenty two tableaux. Each vividly explores distinctive practices of human shielding by excavating diverse types of archival sources—official documents, personal correspondence, memoirs, news media, scholarly works, novels, videogames, and more. The succession of these tableaux occurs mostly in chronological order beginning with the American Civil War, and its Continue reading →